I am a composer, performer, poet, educator, spiritual director, and permanent deacon of the Catholic Church. I just recently retired after 42 years of full-time ministry in the Catholic Church. I continue to serve in the Church part-time. I have been blessed to be united in marriage to my bride, Ruth, since 1974. I am father to four wonderful adult children, and grandfather to five equally wonderful grandchildren. In my lifetime, I have received a B.A. in Music (UST), M.A. in Pastoral Studies (St. Paul Seminary School of Divinity, UST), Certified Spiritual Director. Ordained to the Permanent Diaconate for the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis, in 1991. Composer, musician, author, poet, educator. The Gospels drive my political choices, hence, leading me toward a more liberal, other-centered politics rather than conservative politics. The great commandment of Jesus to love one another as he has loved us, as well as the criteria he gives in Matthew 25 by which we are to be judged at the end of time directs my actions and thoughts.
Though Francis of Assisi is the patron saint of ecology, he was more than what is depicted for most people, namely, a garden statue or a figurine in a bird bath. Coming from a wealthy merchant family, Francis eschewed wealth and chose to live a way of life embracing Gospel poverty. He put on the garment of a beggar, and would beg money for food, or eat that which people threw away in their garbage. He did this so that the rest of the time he could devote himself to preaching and living the Gospel. A famous saying attributed to Francis is “Preach the Gospel at all times. And, if necessary, use words.” His way of life was to copy as closely as humanly possible the life of Jesus depicted in the Gospels. Not burdened with the stuff that weighs down human life, purchasing a house, working to maintain a house, etc, he was free to devote himself to living for God 24/7. He traveled with the Crusades to Palestine and was so shocked at the behavior of the Crusaders (who were prone to raping and pillaging everywhere they went), he knew that the Crusade would fail utterly. Abandoning the Crusaders, he walked into the Muslim army camp with the intention of converting the Sultan. He was brought before the Sultan, who, instead of having him executed, admired the gutsy behavior of Francis. Francis failed in turning the Sultan from Islam. The Sultan awarded Francis the ability to visit all the holy sites of Palestine without any harm. Francis was able to visit the Grotto in Bethlehem in which Jesus was born. He walked the way of the cross to Golgotha and visited the place in which tradition believed Jesus was laid to rest in Joseph of Arimethea’s grave.
When he returned to Italy, because the people were not able to visit these holy sites, he recreated these sites for people locally. In a cave in Grecio, he found a cave that resembled that which was in Bethlehem and he and the local people celebrated Christmas Mass in that cave. The Christmas creches that we have in our homes and churches reminding us of that momentous time in human history when the Son of God was born in our midst. In many Catholic Churches are the Stations of the Cross in which, every Lent, we recall the Passion and Death of Jesus. That is something that Francis brought to Europe.
Many biographies have been written, good and bad about this simple man, whose way of life attracted so many that he established three religious orders that followed his way or order of life: The First Order, Friars Minor (the little brothers) for single men; The Second Order (Poor Clares), for single women (named after Clare of Assisi); and the Third Order (now called Order for Secular Franciscans) for the laity of men and women, married and single who live in the world. We all live lives of Gospel poverty, in which we live very simply, viewing the things we have around us as a gift from God that is meant to be shared with those most in need. We keep what we need to sustain us and give all the rest to those most in need. I was professed a Secular Franciscan in May of 1980 and have strived to live a life of Gospel poverty all these years.
Francis is one of very few who received the stigmata of Jesus (the five wounds of Christ on the cross). He wanted to be so one with Christ that he prayed that he would also share in the sufferings of Christ on the cross. In a mystic vision a Seraph visited Francis as he was praying and fasting, and gave him the wounds of Jesus in his hands, feet, and side. Those wounds were examined and substantiated by others of his time. They were not self-inflicted. The wounds never healed would bleed all the time, yet, Francis did not die from the loss of blood. They remained with him the rest of his life. The most known stigmatist of modern times was the Franciscan Friar, Padre Pio. I believe he died in the 1970’s.
During the late 70’s I compose a piece of music for piano (which I later composed for organ) entitled, “Fanfare For Brother Francis.” I recomposed the piano music for this in 2016 and included it in my music collection Opus 6. In honor of this great man of faith, I have included it here.
REFLECTION FOR THE 26TH SUNDAY IN ORDINARY TIME,
YEAR C
The readings of this week build on those of last week. Who is
the God we adore? Do we adore the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Lazarus the
beggar? Or, do we adore the god of wealth and greed, or Mammon, the name Jesus
gave the god last week? Who we adore will be evidenced in the way we love our
neighbor.
This week we are
presented with a very familiar parable of Jesus from the Gospel of Luke. It is
the parable of the rich man and the beggar Lazarus. The story compares the rich
man who ate well, dressed well, and had all the luxuries that life offers.
Outside the door was the beggar, Lazarus, covered in sores and starving to
death. Jesus points out in the story that the rich man’s dogs ate better than
the beggar outside his door. For his part, the rich man had no compassion for
Lazarus, nor aided the beggar in any way. The one thing in which the rich man
and Lazarus shared was they died at the same time. Lazarus went to heaven, and
the rich man to Hell. Though Lazarus wanted to alleviate the suffering of the
rich man, he was prevented from doing so by the great divide between heaven and
hell. The rich man pleaded with Abraham to forewarn his family to live better
lives than he, lest they, too, be as tormented for eternity as he. Abraham
responds,
“If they will not listen
to Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded if someone should
rise from the dead.”
It is presumed in the parable that the rich man fulfilled all the ritual demands of his Judaism. He observed the outward sign of his religion by going to synagogue on the Sabbath, honoring the rituals and food laws of his religion. All this did not spare him from eternal damnation because he did not love and care for his neighbor. As we examine our own lives, are we guilty of the same. We come to Mass on Sunday, we pray our prayers. To the outside observer we demonstrate our Catholicism. However, if we ignore the needs of the poor and those most in need, we will find ourselves in the same unpleasant place as the rich man in the parable.
Our worship of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob is only
validated in the way we serve and love our neighbor. Jesus makes this very
clear in the Great Commandment. But it is also something that is emphasized by
the Paul and James.
In his first letter to the Corinthians (11:17-22), Paul condemns
the Corinthian community for the sin of the rich man in the parable for today.
They are ignoring the needs of the poor within their own community. “In giving this instruction, I do not praise the fact that your
meetings are doing more harm than good. First of all, I hear that when
you meet as a church there are divisions among you, and to a degree I believe
it; there
have to be factions among you in order that (also) those who are approved among
you may become known. When you meet in one place, then, it is not to eat the Lord’s
supper, for
in eating, each one goes ahead with his own supper, and one goes hungry while
another gets drunk. Do you not have houses in which you can eat and drink? Or do you
show contempt for the church of God and make those who have nothing feel
ashamed? What can I say to you? Shall I praise you? In this matter I do not
praise you.” Paul
continues that this behavior robs the words of consecration of their validity. Those
guilty of this eat and drink their own damnation.
James emphasizes this all the more in his letter. He writes (2:1-8), “My brothers, show no partiality as you adhere to the faith in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ. For if a man with gold rings on his fingers and in fine clothes comes into your assembly, and a poor person in shabby clothes also comes in, and you pay attention to the one wearing the fine clothes and say, “Sit here, please,” while you say to the poor one, “Stand there,” or “Sit at my feet,” have you not made distinctions among yourselves and become judges with evil designs? Listen, my beloved brothers. Did not God choose those who are poor in the world to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom that he promised to those who love him? But you dishonored the poor person … However, if you fulfill the royal law according to the scripture, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself,” you are doing well.”
James warns his community to not follow the example of the rich
man in the parable. (James 5:1-5) “Come
now, you rich, weep and wail over your impending miseries. Your wealth has
rotted away, your clothes have become moth-eaten, your gold and silver have
corroded, and that corrosion will be a testimony against you; it will devour
your flesh like a fire. You have stored up treasure for the last days. Behold,
the wages you withheld from the workers who harvested your fields are crying
aloud, and the cries of the harvesters have reached the ears of the Lord of
hosts. You have lived on earth in luxury and pleasure; you have fattened your
hearts for the day of slaughter.”
Last but not least, Mary, the Mother of Jesus, speaks the same
message in her great Canticle of praise, “My soul proclaims the greatness of
the Lord; my spirit rejoices in God my savior. For he has looked upon his
handmaid’s lowliness; behold, from now on will all ages call me blessed. The
Mighty One has done great things for me, and holy is his name. His mercy is
from age to age to those who fear him. He has shown might with his arm,
dispersed the arrogant of mind and heart.
He has thrown down the rulers from their thrones
but lifted up the lowly.
The hungry he has filled with good things;
the rich he has sent away empty.
He has helped Israel his servant,
remembering his mercy, according to his promise to our fathers,
to Abraham and to his descendants forever.”
(Luke 1:46-55)
This message of Jesus, the prophets, the apostles, Paul and
James, are pertinent to those of us who call ourselves disciples of Jesus. This
is especially so when the message that is preached by our culture and some of
our politicians is one in which the individual self is glorified to the
detriment of the poor in our nation and on our borders. It is not enough to
just say our prayers and go to Mass on Sunday. To say we worship God and ignore
the needs of the poor, then, as James states clearly, our faith is dead and
worthless. Our faith and our works must match, otherwise we are nothing more
than a “noisy gong and a clashing cymbal”. (1 Cor. 1:13).
Is
the religion in which we believe all words and no works? If it is, then we may
suffer the same fate as the rich man in the parable today. To paraphrase the
words of Abraham to the rich man at the end of the parable; if we will not listen to Moses
and the prophets, and, I might add, Jesus, Paul, and James, then neither will we
be persuaded if someone should rise from the dead. We have been forewarned.
It was this past Wednesday, September 25th, that Ruthie turned to me and said, “Yesterday was your 25th ordination anniversary.” I looked at the calendar and realized I had forgotten that day. Usually, milestone anniversaries don’t get overlooked. I suppose three surgeries in a time span of 12 weeks has a way of refocusing one’s attention.
A lot of time has passed since that momentous day. I have changed in so many ways. I remarked in a note to a friend that at the time of my ordination, I thought I had a good idea of what I was getting myself into having already worked 17 years for the Church and knowing all the grace and goodness of the Church and all the shitty part of the Church as a human institution. Of course, I hadn’t a clue. As in all things of life, were we to know all the good and bad of every life changing decision we make, e.g. working in a new job, moving to a new community, getting into a relationship, we would probably never make any decision or change at all. I can honestly say, knowing what I do know today, I would still seek to be ordained a deacon.
It has been an incredible adventure in faith. Were I not ordained as a deacon I would never have had the opportunity to grow in my faith and meet so many people of great faith. I would never have gotten to know the tremendous faith, courage, and friendship of the many Latinos I have come to know. I would never have been moved by the lives and faith of those in the LGBTQ community, the homeless, the disenfranchised, the ex-offenders, and so many wonderful people who changed my life utterly. I would never have learned how to cope with my own limitations and my own health crises were it not ministering to so many people challenged by health, by grief, and so many other challenges. These people ministered to me more than I ministered to them. The presence of God in their lives have illuminated for me that same presence of God in my own life.
Getting into diaconal formation took approximately a year. Ruth and I went through the application process twice. After many interviews, 8 hours of psychological tests with an in depth follow up with a psychiatrist, we came to our last interview with the selection team. On our drive up to the interview, Ruthie told me in the car that she wasn’t ready for me to start diaconal formation. I always respect everything about Ruth and I said, we will take ourselves out of formation. Upon meeting with the selection team, I told them that Ruth wasn’t ready for this commitment and I withdrew my application. They told me to wait and reapply. A couple of years later, Ruth was ready and we did most of the application process all over again and we were accepted into the program.
We met with our selection team twice a year. I remember the team asking Ruth whether she was okay with me becoming a deacon. She replied, “He is already doing diaconal work. Nothing is going to change much for the family and I.” Truth be told, Ruth is better qualified to be a deacon than I.
After three years of many classes, retreats, many nights away from family, the time for ordination arrived. It was the summer of 1994 when Ruth and I went with the rest of the class to meet with Archbishop Roach. It was then we signed all the papers that would connect our lives with the Catholic Church in ways we never thought possible. I remember when it came to signing the paper stating that should our wives die, we would remain single and celibate the rest of our lives. With the exception of the one bachelor in our class, John Mangan, all pens paused as we consider the commitment we were making. With our wives standing behind us, their right hand on our right shoulders, our pens descended and we sighed and then we signed.
The Thursday and Friday before our ordination (our ordination was on Saturday, September 24, at 10 am), our diaconal class gathered at the Mary Hill house (mansion) on University Avenue for our ordination retreat. Bishop Larry Welsh was our retreat master. It was a powerful time for Ruthie and I, and I believe all of our class. Bishop Welsh told us of his own spiritual journey. How is own alcoholism led him into behaviors he would never have done sober, and how it nearly ended his ministry as a bishop. Having resigned as bishop of Spokane, he began his recovery living at the Basilica in Minneapolis, working at Branch 3 of Catholic Charities ministering to the homeless, and just being with people, none of whom knew he was a bishop. On Easter, the rector of the Basilica asked Welsh to preside as bishop at one of the Easter liturgies. As he walked in procession in vestments, miter and crosier, one of his homeless buddies shouted to him, “Larry! I didn’t know you worked here!” Bishop Welsh taught me that our sinfulness can be a path to greater growth and strength as people of faith. Larry Welsh was a very humble man, and was a tremendous help to me as I began my ministry as a deacon. The other thing that both Ruth and I took away from the retreat was a great love for tomato basil soup. The chef that was hired made a tremendous tomato basil soup and though everyone begged for his recipe, we had to get use to the disappointment of not getting his recipe.
I was as nervous and excited the day of my ordination as I was the day of my wedding to Ruth. The day was cool and cloudy. Getting to the Cathedral was a bit of hassle. President Clinton was in town and some of the major thoroughfares to the Cathedral were blocked by the Secret Service and police because of the President’s motorcade.
I have often said that getting ordained was similar to getting married, only this time I was wearing the long white dress. Many of those ordained with me were wearing knee pads having been warned that the hard marble floor of the Cathedral sanctuary was hard on the knees. Of the Mass, I remember kneeling on that hard marble floor. Laying prostrate on the floor as the prayers were prayed by the Archbishop over my class and I. I remember getting up, kneeling before the Archbishop and placing my folded hands within his, promising him my obedience to him and his successors. And, then, the moment (pictured above) when he placed his hands on either side of my head, and prayed the prayers of ordination, ordaining me a deacon. After the ordination ritual, we rejoined our wives, now as ordained deacons and worshipped with them for the rest of the Mass.
I had composed a special hymn for the ordination Mass, dedicated to Trish Flannigan. Trish, administrative secretary to the diaconate and diaconal formation of the Archdiocese was a de facto member of my ordination class and to this day remains a good, dear friend and a part of my diaconal family. The hymn (heard above as it was heard at the Cathedral that day) is a sung Trinitarian prayer, asking God to bless us in our ministry to those God is sending us to serve. In 2018, I decided to reimagine the same hymn as music for solo piano. There is the piano version of the same hymn.
The homeless guy that nearly drained the communion cup (Deacons are liturgically the minister of the Blood of Christ at Mass), the wonderful reception held for me at St Hubert by choir members, friends, and staff, following the ordination Mass, and my first Mass as an ordained deacon at St Hubert will remain in memory to the time I die.
While I can speak only from my own experience, initially it is easy to get caught up in the liturgical role as a deacon. I have served as a deacon at many Archdiocesan Liturgies (confirmations, ordinations, Chrism Mass and so on), and of course, at many Masses on the parish level. I have baptized many babies, and witnessed many marriages. I have presided over many wakes and funerals. But truth be told, to be ordained to put on a long white dress and wear a diagonal stole is not what it means to be a deacon. It is just a small part of a more important ministry.
Being a deacon is going into places where priests may not often be welcome. It is going to places where others may feel uncomfortable. It is sometimes being a religious target for those who are angry at God, religion, and the Church. It is often ministering to people at the lowest times in their lives, when they are hurting the most. Helping women and children out of dangerous domestic violence situations. It is often just being a quiet listener as folks pour out their lives to you. It is being in the most sacred place of all, that interior place where a person encounters the God who created him/her. There are those intimate secrets that people will reveal to you that they will not even reveal to their spouse. Being a deacon is clothing yourself in the social justice doctrine of the Catholic Church, being a thorn in the side of those who are unjust, including civil authorities (and Church authorities) and speaking out publicly to the injustices perpetuated by others, even when it is not popular. It is the reporting of physical, sexual abuse of minors by family, clergy, to the authorities (I have done both over 25 years). It is long hours, being on call 24/7, hours away from family on Christmas, Easter, and other major times in a life of a family.
Being a deacon is about often being and feeling ignored, unsupported, and forgotten by the Chancery (not always a bad thing, mind you). It means sometimes being rejected by people you serve (especially those whose faith life is stuck in a pre-Vatican II Church). It means not receiving much in the way of affirmation. It means doing your ministry and not being recognized for the ministry you do because most of it is not public and behind the scenes.
What a deacon is not, is getting sucked into the superiority, demi-god mindset of clericalism. It is not about wearing a Roman Collar and getting the high places at the table or a celebration. If a deacon gets all caught up in the smells and bells of liturgy, and the glory that clericalism demands, then the deacon is worthless.
Why on earth would anyone want to be a deacon, if the life of a deacon is challenging and has it own level of negativity? I remember all this being presented to Ruth and I by our selection team when we were in formation. The selection team didn’t mince words. They basically told us that the life of a deacon is hard, often without much reward publicly, often without much support from chancery, sometimes abuse by those you serve and so on. The team always ended with the question, “Knowing this why on earth do you still want to be ordained a deacon?”
This is a good question. Why on earth do I want to be a deacon? Am I a masochist in some S & M relationship with the Catholic Church? No. It is hard to put into words.
To answer the question, I felt called to be a deacon by God. Not some crazy Michele Bachmann thing where she believed God spoke to her to be a member of the House of Representatives or to run for the presidency. God did not speak to me in a specific way. Rather, it is knowing deep inside me that I was being called to something different. I knew this even as a young adolescent. I went on a retreat and knew that I wasn’t called to the priesthood. Besides, I REALLY like girls, and looking at Ruthie, you can understand my great attraction to her.
It was that same feeling I had when I knew that I wanted to marry Ruthie. I just knew. I knew that I was being called to something more and could not get rid of that feeling even when I wanted not to be bothered by it or tried to ignore it. I felt called to something deeper. Then, the diaconate was restored to a permanent ordained order in the Church. Having discovered this, I just knew that it was to the diaconate to which God was calling me. Like I said earlier, I had a good idea of how the Church as a human institution, uses, abuses and casts off people who serve the Church, just like any business or human institution. Yet I still felt called to serve this institution we call the Church.
It is all couched in mystery. It is in that realm of God, when ones journey is dictated by a dream (a la the prophet Daniel, or Joseph, spouse of Mary, the mother of God), by an angel (a la Gabriel and Mary). You just know and cannot explain it. It dogs you everywhere you go. You can’t escape it. You just know.
Secondly, the deacon embodies Christ as Servant. We are joined to Christ, the Suffering Servant of Isaiah. The suffering, the rejection, etc of Jesus is that depicted of Isaiah’s account of the Suffering Servant. Accolades, affirmation, and places of honor are not meant to be the path of those who are called to be servants either of God or human manors. As Jesus said in the Gospel, you are just being a good servant. You are just doing that which you have been called to do. Nothing more. Expect nothing more.
At the same time, Jesus will say, well done good and faithful servant. Receive the reward awaiting you. It is this becoming one with Jesus, The Servant of God, that makes the diaconal ministry so powerful, and helps when you get shit on sometimes by the institutional Church and those you may be called to serve. It is this powerful “oneing” with Jesus, to use the term of Julian of Norwich, that sustains the deacon during the lowest times of ministry and offers hope.
I remember coming home from St Hubert, the Sunday following my ordination. Ruthie plopped on the couch in the living room. She looked at me and asked, “Being a deacon mean being a servant, right?” I replied, “Yes.”. She then said quietly, “Good. Serve me.” If only I served her as much as she has served me. If only I served her as much as I served those assigned to me as a deacon. Now that I am retired, perhaps, I can begin to serve her in the manner she deserves.
REFLECTION FOR THE 25TH SUNDAY IN
ORDINARY TIME, YEAR C
I find it interesting that on United States money we imprint the words, “In God We Trust”. Giving the surface upon which it is printed, I find the words almost an oxymoron. In the history of our nation, it has been proven that for many in our nation, it is not God in whom we trust, it is the money upon which the words are printed. So I ask, in whom do we place our trust? God or money?
In the reading from Amos (Amos 8:4-7*), we hear the prophet condemning the wealthy of his time who place more trust in their wealth than in the God who created them. In fact, their religious rituals are nothing more than rituals devoid of all spirituality. The words spoken in their rituals are empty. They wait impatiently for the Sabbath to end so that they can abuse and cheat the poor. “We will buy the lowly for silver, and the poor for a pair of sandals; even the refuse of the wheat we will sell!” Their greed is so abominable that God responds with these words, “The LORD has sworn by the pride of Jacob: “Never will I forget a thing they have done!”
In Paul’s 1st
letter to Timothy, we hear Paul asking Christians to pray for those in
government so that all people may live in peace. Then He follows that up by
stating very clearly that there is only one who is Lord of heaven and earth,
whose power overshadows those of earthly leaders. That one is Jesus Christ.
In the Gospel, Jesus addresses clearly that the greatest false god that humans worship is wealth/greed. Jesus challenges his followers that they must make a clear choice as to whom they will serve. Will they serve God, or will they serve wealth/greed? They cannot serve both.
Every time we turn on the news, we are presented with those who serve God and those who serve wealth and greed. Both God and wealth/greed are served equally by those appointed and elected in our government. We see the horrendous impact of wealth and greed in the policies of our government. The denial of climate change, the systemic deregulation of that which protects our environment, benefits economically the interests of the petroleum, natural gas, and coal industries. The deregulation of our financial institutions benefit only the wealthy and greedy and cheat and bankrupt all others. The defunding of the safety nets that protect the poor, the elderly, and the unemployed of our nation, for example, the defunding of food stamps, programs like Head Start, unemployment, the assault on the Affordable Healthcare Act, Medicare, Medicaid, on Social Security, benefit the big pharmaceutical and insurance companies. This is just a sampling of the choice of wealth/greed being served in our government.
If we begin to examine the policies of many of the conglomerates of our nation and the world, wealth/greed is overwhelmingly the god that is most greatly served. God’s words we hear in the first reading from the prophet Amos are very pointed. “Never will I forget a thing they have done!”
It is easy to blame all the woes of our world on the wealthy and greedy that serve in world governments and world conglomerates and industries. However, to quote the great philosopher, Pogo, “We have met the enemy and he is us!” It is necessary to examine how we might be as guilty as the wealthy and greedy, albeit in lesser ways, of the same idolatry.
On a personal
level, it boils down to whether we adopt a lifestyle that models that of Jesus,
who came to serve God and those most in need, or whether we adopt a model of life
that serves our own self-interests only. Are our lives governed by the Great
Commandment of Jesus to love God with all our minds, strength, and hearts? Or
are our lives governed by Original Sin, best described by Norm Peterson from
the television comedy, Cheers, as, “It’s a dog eat dog world and I’m wearing Milk
Bone underwear.”?
We have to reflect
on that which motivates us to do the things we do. Do we hoard what we have, or
are we willing to share from our abundance with those who are in need? Do we hoard
use the gifts that God has given us to benefit only ourselves? Or, do we use
our God given gifts to benefit others? Is everything in our lives defined by
the question of “What’s in it for me?” Or, our lives defined by the question, “What’s
best for all concerned?” These questions begin to define whether we live idolatrous
lives worshipping wealth/greed, or whether we worship the one, true God.
In my ministry to
the Latino community, I remember one family who was experiencing some car
trouble. I asked my friend whether he needed some assistance. He said no. There
was a Latino mechanic that lived in the same building who fixed the car. When I
asked my friend how much it cost, he told me that the mechanic fixed it for nothing.
Then, taking down a framed picture from the wall, my friend took $40 that was
taped to the back of the picture and said, “You can’t eat nothing.” And, then
gave the money to the mechanic. This is how we live lives that worship God.
In whom do we trust? God or money? We can’t do
both.
REFLECTION FOR THE 24TH SUNDAY IN ORDINARY TIME, YEAR C
Throughout sacred scripture, God’s unilateral mercy and compassion are on display for us. The Sodom and Gomorrah stories are few and far between. From the moment that God cut a covenant with Abram, God reaching out to Israel through the prophets, to the Incarnation of Jesus, God’s relationship with humanity is less about fire and brimstone, and abundantly more about God’s love, mercy, and compassion. We hear so often that God loved humanity so much that God’s only Son was sent to redeem us. The Lord’s Prayer is all about God’s unlimited love and compassion.
The only
ceiling that God’s mercy and compassion has for us is determined by us. Jesus
tells us that the love and mercy we give to others will be the standard by
which God’s love and mercy will be given us. This is very important. In the
judgment of the nations (Mt 25:31-44), Jesus graphically describes what
eternity will be like for those whose love, mercy, and compassion is like that
of Christ’s and whose love, mercy, and compassion is contrary to that of
Christ’s.
Our
starting point is that of the apostle Paul in his 1st letter to
Timothy. He writes, “Christ Jesus came into the world to
save sinners. Of these I am the foremost. But for that reason I was mercifully
treated,
so that in me, as the foremost, Christ Jesus might display all
his patience as an example for those who would come to believe in him for
everlasting life. (1 Tim 1:15b-16)
If we are to receive the fulness of
God’s love, mercy, and compassion, we must not be blind to our own sinfulness.
We, like Paul, must acknowledge it and own it. One of the greatest gifts of
married life with my bride, Ruthie, is her ability to affirm me for being
loving and to address me at those times when I am unloving. She keeps me honest
and grounded in my humanity.
There will always be those for whom we have absolutely no sympathy, much less want to extend our love, mercy and compassion. Oh, how much we may want God’s wrath blaze and consume them, as described in the first reading. Think of how the early Christian community regarded Paul who was implicated in the murder of the deacon, Stephen, and countless other Christians. Do you not think they might have harbored feelings of resentment and even hatred toward Paul? Yet, God called them to forgive Paul, and he, in turn, became a mighty champion of the Christian faith.
I am no different than anyone. There
are those toward whom I feel great resentment for wrongs committed against me. Yet,
in spite of all this, I, as a disciple of Jesus, have to acknowledge that Jesus
loves them as much as Jesus loves me. They might be the lost sheep after whom
Jesus leaves his flock to recover, and over whose repentance all the angels
will rejoice.
It may irk me that as much as they
might repulse me, and I might generate enough ill will that I would wish them to
account for their sins in eternal darkness, Jesus thinks otherwise. Am I as
able as Jesus to forgive all the harm they may have caused me? I don’t know. I
hope so, for it is what Jesus is calling me to do (though I may vomit a little
in my mouth as I am doing so … alas, I am still human).
The scriptures make it clear to us
that if we are ever to heal from the injustices and harm others have caused us,
that healing can come only by forgiveness. Those who have witnessed the
execution of those who murdered a love one will attest that the satisfaction
the death of the murderer provided is at best temporary and heals nothing. In
the end, vengeance only consumes our lives and makes us bitter. True healing is
only found by walking a path of forgiveness. Jesus commands us to love one
another and pray for those who persecute us. To love as Jesus loved requires us
also to forgive one another as Jesus forgives us.
I sit in my time machine and dial my tablet to 1971, Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, and take my seat in the vast theater. With great anticipation I await with Jacqueline Kennedy Onaissis the great work of musical theater she commissioned Leonard Bernstein to compose, a living musical memorial to her late husband, MASS: A Theater Piece For Singers, Players and Dancers.
This is no Mass of my memory, Missa Solemnis, Mass in B Minor, nor anything that would ever spill from mind to quill to paper by Mozart, Schubert, or Palestrina. A formal choir, a street choir, a boy’s choir, dancers, rock musicians, assemble on stage, two orchestras, one on stage, the other in the pit, cavalcade of motion, bright colors, tonal colors, a brilliant and messy litter of musical styles: chant, rock, classical consonance, Jazz, blues, atonal dissonance and electronic. I ponder what I am witnessing: prayerful profanity? Sacred sacrilege? Thrilled, stunned, captivated, repulsed? No, no this is no Mass of my memory.
Built upon the musical block of the old Latin stoic, emotionless Proper of the Tridentine Rite, juxtaposed with English language tropes, probing, questioning, doubting, condemning blind faith. Music shaping stoic belief with life influenced disbelief. The celebrant’s desperate attempt to move, persuade, instill faith into an atmosphere of escalating cynicism. Sung rebuffs of “Where is God” – in mass genocide, in terminal and chronic illnesses, in the torture chambers of dictators, the families of the disappeared, in poverty stricken ghettos, in the racism of Jim Crow, in cultures of excess?
The doubt and disbelief crescendos, in a cynical circle dance to Agnus Dei’s Dona Nobis Pacem, “Grant us Peace,” the singers dance, the dancers sing, a whirl of accusation against a God who promises peace but in whom none find peace. A chaotic peace, chaotic demands for peace assail and tear at the celebrant, his soul as ripped as his vestments, holding the sacred species, as a shield to ward off in desperation the sonic assault of anger and disbelief. In frustration and defeat, chalice and monstrance cast to the floor, shattering, spilling, broken shards of Christ’s body, mixed with that of his own.
How well have I experienced my own soul shattered, my spirit’s blood spilled by the people I served, by the Church I served, used, abused, and abandoned. How many times have I raised my arms to the heavens and cried, “Dona Nobis Pacem!” Then, nothingness. Silence. Gathering the shards of my broken self, carefully, trepidatiously, fit them together, and like the broken celebrant, hand grasped by an innocent, return to ministry, parting with my abusers, with an empty “Pax Vobiscum”.
My time machine whisks me back, no longer in my theater seat, but my red chair at home. Incredulity and condemnation, cheers and jeers, praise and admiration echoes from the now distant past premier. I bask in its sacred acrimony, uncanny its wondrous prophecy. The Church more chaotic peace, than Dona Nobis Pacem. The ordained offspring of John Paul and Benedict, clericalism parading about sanctuaries, a sanctimonious La Cage aux Folles. Demigods adorned in gold lamay, evoking Latin as it were magic, their backs to the people, their magician arms waving about trying to return to a time when priests were thought demigods, stripped of all humanity, though well we know by the lives shattered by their sexual sins of the past, their broken human nature. Present day demigods seek peace built upon a false past. Their Pax Vobiscum as empty as their mythological memory of what was once.
What truth is gleaned by Bernstein’s Mass? It was composed by a broken composer for the broken widow shattered by the deaths of her assassinated husband, her assassinated brother-in-law, and a nation broken by war, prejudice and violence. God’s Dona Nobis Pacem is not the domain of those who are whole, but on the fingertips of our broken fingers.
(c) 2019, Robert Charles Wagner. All rights reserved.
*As quickly as it was recorded, I bought a copy of Leonard Bernstein’s Mass in 1971. The family record player was in the finished basement of my parent’s home and I spent a countless amount of time listening to music there. I must have worn out that double LP set of the Mass. It was so out of the realm I knew as sacred music. It was sacred and profane at the same time. It was disturbing, musically transporting, captivating, and wonderfully corrupted by modern musical idioms. I have listened to it now and again over the years, but after forty-two years of church ministry have had the freedom to REALLY listen to it again, with a reflection on my experience juxtaposed with that of the celebrant.
My chair, at times over the past twelve weeks my prison cell. Seven weeks more before my sentence is completed. But today, my chair is going to be my time machine.
Not flashy and gaudy, with a Christmas display of flashing, colorful lights, nor as threatening as that celebrated machine of H.G. Wells.
I sit in my time machine. With headphones and tablet, I am able to travel to Vienna to hear Mozart and Beethoven, to be in the audience with the screaming horde witnessing the Beatle’s first appearance at the Ed Sullivan Theater.
Perhaps I will sit in the historic Carnegie Hall, for the 1938 Jazz Concert with Benny Goodman, Lionel Hampton, Gene Krupa, Harry James and Teddy Wilson, hearing in person, “Sing, Sing, Sing” and, “Bei Mir Bist Du Schon”.
Or shall I travel to the Civil War battlefields of Stephen Crane, to Guadacanal, or Iwo Jima, to Ireland and William Butler Yeats speaking his magical words?
Shall I travel inter-dimensionally to Asimov’s Foundation, or Frank Herbert’s Dune, and the future worlds of Heinlein, with a detour to Tolkein’s Middle Earth, dodging orcs and spending a day with Tom Bombadil and Goldberry?
The gift of time and Inter-dimensional travel. Where shall I travel today?
Were I to be as kind as my father, who saw God’s face equally in the rich and the poor alike; Whose honesty was impeccable, whose integrity could never be challenged, who worked always for the greater good; Whose wisdom was greater than Solomon’s; Whose compassion and love defined his every action and word.
Were I to be as kind as my mother, who had such great trust in God, in whom her twelve year old self found comfort and love at the deaths of her mother and sister; Who taught in the ghetto schools of Pittsburg, Whose knowledge never inflated her ego but compelled her to serve others in love, Who centered all on her husband and family, Who invited the friendless to her family’s table at home, And took them in as her own; Who continued to comfort those lost and forgotten even at times she felt lost; Whose compassion and love defined her every action and word.
Yet, I am not my father and my mother. I am not their identical clone. They loved me and taught me, fed me and shaped me, then let me go out on my own. I must choose to be honest as my father, to see God’s image in every face, to place great value in personal integrity, and to work for the greater good. I must seek God’s wisdom in all things, and, like my mother, trust God in all of life’s tragedies and joys, To seek out God in the poor, give all to my family, and, welcome the friendless around my family’s table at home. I must choose to comfort the lost and forgotten, even at times I feel lost, to choose to allow compassion and love to define my every action and word.
(c) 2019, Robert Charles Wagner. All rights reserved.
*I have been thinking of my mom and dad a lot, the last couple of months. I have thought often of the lives they led. In spite of the great adversities they experienced personally, the deaths of parents and siblings, the Great Depression, poverty, a World War, religious discrimination etc, they never allowed their adversities to color their lives negatively. Rather, it seems the adversities compelled them to define their lives in a positive way, to make a better world than the one in which they grew as children.
We often hear such sayings like “the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.” While children may choose to adopt the values and attributes of their parents, the truth remains that many children also choose to do otherwise. In the end, we are not clones of our parents. It is always a matter of choice. In the end, it is for us to choose the direction of our lives and how we respond to the tragedies and joys. I far prefer to be remembered in the way others remember mom and dad, people whose compassion and love defined their words and their actions.
You walk into the room With your pencil in your hand You see somebody naked And you say, “Who is that man?” You try so hard But you don’t understand Just what you’ll say When you get home
Because something is happening here But you don’t know what it is Do you, Mister Jones?*
For those who have followed my blog via Facebook (though Facebook is making this increasingly difficult), this has been a very difficult Summer. A broken ankle, three surgeries on that ankle, the most recent on September 6th, and another projected 7 weeks of healing, and watching my favorite season, Summer, pass by my window as I sit in my chair, has been an experience of varying degrees of frustration. There are times I sit here stewing in my lack of independence.
Ruthie, my loving bride of almost 45 years, has been remarkable, helping me in a myriad amount of ways, from fetching medication, food, water, emptying urinals, helping me bathe and more. My gratitude for all the love I have experienced from Ruth, family, and friends has far out-weighed the pain and inconvenience this injury has caused me.
Ruthie likes to have a lot of background noise around her, hence, her favorite cable news station is on quite a bit (thankfully not the mindless dribble of Fox Cable News). Every now and again, there is a respite from Cable News with sojourns into HGTV and DYI TV. One can only see the same old episodes of Chip and JoJo Gaines (Fixer Upper), ugly Americans, spoiled by opulence, trying to assimilate to life in other world nations (House Hunters International), or Tarek and Christina play out the real life drama of their broken marriage while flipping houses in Orange County, California (Flip or Flop) so many times before going brain dead. Cable television is not quite the panacea of entertainment we would like to think it is. HBO keeps on playing the same films, most of them either depressing, sophomoric, or uninteresting.
Into this bog of intellectual, moral, and mindless decay (reminiscent of the dead marshes that Frodo, Samwise, and Gollum cross getting to Mordor, Lord of the Rings), is the corruption, the crimes, the racism, and the crimes against humanity being perpetrated upon our nation and the world by donald trump and his administration. And, anyone with any brains and common sense knows that it is only going to get worse as we get closer to national election of 2020. I feel like taking out my old Cold War comedy records with Tom Lehrer singing his song, “So long, mom. I’m off to drop the bomb, so don’t wait up for me.” (Note: At the height of the Cuban Missile Crises, Lehrer believed that we wouldn’t have time to have a popular “war” song, as we had had for all the “other wars” because all the earth would be obliterated in one gigantic nuclear flash. So, he decided to create one.)
As I was praying morning prayer
today, I came upon this passage from the first reading for Mass.
As my lengthy introduction to this verse demonstrates, all that is on television is for the most part an “empty, seductive philosophy according to human tradition.” It is amazing how easily we, as human beings, get sucked into the mindless world of television; the equally empty, mindless, empty, racist world of donald trump and those sucking up to him for political favors, and, theatrical works being past off as “art” on HBO. It all comes up empty, especially when we have to confront the horror of all the mass shootings in the United States, the human and physical devastation of global warming with Hurricane Dorian, and the plight of immigrants throughout the world fleeing the poverty and violence of their homelands.
Perhaps we flee into these worlds as a way of escaping the vapidness of our own existence. Perhaps, we seek to escape the horror of human violence around us. Is it any wonder that people seek escape in the myriad amount of drugs? While much of the blame for the current opiod epidemic is rightly placed on the criminal behavior on Big Pharma, it is very tempting to reach for a couple of 5 mg oxycodone tablets. However, the 60’s taught us that Timothy Leary’s axiom, “Turn on, tune in, drop out,” accomplishes only self-destruction. The drug and alcohol culture is just a vast seductive wasteland of empty human philosophy littered with human self-destruction.
You raise up your head And you ask, “Is this where it is?” And somebody points to you and says “It’s his” And you say, “What’s mine?” And somebody else says, “Where what is?” And you say, “Oh my God Am I here all alone?”
Because something is happening here But you don’t know what it is Do you, Mister Jones?
It was really driven home last night as Ruthie and I were watching HGTV’s “A Very Brady Renovation”, as a stable of HGTV’s favorite fixer-up celebrities, along with the original cast of the Brady Bunch television show, were trying to transform the home the show used for “outside” shots, into that which was built on the sound stage of the show over 40 years ago. I felt my brain cells leaking out of my ears as one of the “Brady kids”, now in his 50’s, tried to match paint to the original house color portrayed on the television show. Really??? Over and over, everyone kept on repeating it was “very important” to get the color correct, as if the balance of world order depended on whether it was the exact shade of pukey cream or not. It was at this point when I turned to Ruthie and said, “Who really gives a shit?” The television show was crappy and mindless in the 70’s and nothing has much changed since it was, thankfully, removed from television.
You have many contacts Among the lumberjacks To get you facts When someone attacks your imagination But nobody has any respect Anyway they already expect you To just give a check To tax-deductible charity organizations
You’ve been with the professors And they’ve all liked your looks With great lawyers you have Discussed lepers and crooks You’ve been through all of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s books You’re very well read It’s well known
Because something is happening here But you don’t know what it is Do you, Mister Jones?
While I am sure the world of Paul’s Colossian community was not as consumed by our current mindless activities, they had their own set of equally mindless, 1st century activities and empty human philosophies. Though they may not have had the news pundits and “authorities and experts” gathered in television cable news stations of our world today, the Greeks equally loved philosophical debates and discussions (Paul related how he got involved in these debates as he preached the Gospel). What is historically clear is humanity remains easily duped and captivated by the empty promises of “human tradition.” It speaks volumes when the late night comedians, like Steven Colbert, John Oliver, and Seth Meyers, point out the folly of much of what we see and hear on television. How sad that it is the comedians who speak truth, not those experts upon whom we rely for our news. As my son, Andy, once said to me, “If I really want to know what is truthfully going on, I will watch The Daily Show with Jon Stewart.”
Well, the sword swallower, he comes up to you And then he kneels He crosses himself And then he clicks his high heels And without further notice He asks you how it feels And he says, “Here is your throat back Thanks for the loan”
Because something is happening here But you don’t know what it is Do you, Mister Jones?
I find that I must take Paul’s words to heart to receive, walk, root myself and build upon the faith I have received in Christ Jesus. For it is only in Christ in which I will experience the fullness I need in my life. If I don’t, I will be no better off than the clueless, self-important “Mr Jones” of Dylan’s “Ballad Of A Thin Man.”
Now you see this one-eyed midget Shouting the word “NOW” And you say, “For what reason?” And he says, “How?” And you say, “What does this mean?” And he screams back, “You’re a cow Give me some milk Or else go home”
Because something is happening here But you don’t know what it is Do you, Mister Jones?
REFLECTION ON THE 23RD SUNDAY IN ORDINARY TIME,
YEAR C
Great
crowds were traveling with Jesus,
and he turned and addressed them,
“If anyone comes to me without hating his father and mother,
wife and children, brothers and sisters,
and even his own life,
he cannot be my disciple.
Whoever does not carry his own cross and come after me
cannot be my disciple. (Luke 14: 25-26, NAB)
When
we read these words, we might think initially that Jesus is just plain sadistic
if not out and out crazy. Who goes around telling people that they must hate
their families, hate their own children, if they are to be a disciple of Jesus?
Is this the same Jesus in another Gospel who says to let the little children
come to me and don’t hinder them? Is this the same Jesus in this very Gospel
who tells the parable of the Prodigal Son? How do many of the sentiments that
Jesus speaks elsewhere make sense with what he is saying today?
Context
is everything, hence, the danger of taking any words out of context. Jesus is speaking
metaphorically, not literally, of course. What Jesus is driving home to his
audience is to what level of commitment they are prepared to make in order to
be his disciple. He is asking them if they are prepared to abandon everything
in order to follow him. Discipleship is not just a whim, Jesus says, it is an
utter change in one’s life. It truly is an “all or nothing” commitment.
As
human beings, we often sum up who a person is by what she/he owns. Look at the
amount of prestige that is attached to people who own the finest cars, the most
luxurious homes, who eat at the finest restaurants, and travel to exotic
places. Our newspapers, our magazines are filled with stories about “those
people” who have all these things. Jesus would look at all that opulence, all
that wealth, and declare it a great burden to carry in life. All the “stuff”
that we own does not ease our lives, but rather burdens our lives for the
simple reason we have to “take care” of that stuff. We have to mind that stuff,
and protect our stuff, store that stuff, provide for that stuff in order to
keep it. “The stuff” of our lives does not free us, rather, it weighs us down
and prevents us from having the freedom needed to follow him as his disciple.
Anyone who has any moral fiber would readily attest that people and relationships are not commodities to be owned or controlled. Only perpetrators of domestic violence, slave owners, and the like would consider people, including their own families, as commodities, things to be used and abused. However, most of us place a very high value on our attachment to our families. They are important. What wouldn’t we do to alleviate the suffering of one of our children? We would do everything we could, right? To be a disciple of Jesus, Jesus is asking us for a level of commitment that is even higher than our commitment to our family. If we are truly committed to be a disciple of Jesus, we must be ready for a commitment greater than we hold to our parents, our spouse, and our children. There is a story about Francis of Assisi that illustrates this very well.
Francis came from a very wealthy family. His father was a successful merchant of the finest clothes. He was very disappointed when Francis showed no interest in running the family merchant business. His son, Francis, had become this religious nut, trying to rebuild an abandon ruin of a chapel in the middle of no where, begging for food, becoming, what many of us would consider, a bum, a ne’er do well . On top of it, Francis was taking his father’s clothing merchandise and selling it so that he could give the proceeds of the sales to the poor.
His
father had had enough and decided to confront his son in public in the middle
of Assisi. In a very crowded square, Francis’ father confronted him, cursed
him, and disowned him. In front of his father and the whole citizenry, Francis strips
off all his clothing and stands naked and declares that he had only one father,
and that was God the Father. Francis then put on the clothes of a beggar and
began to live a life of Gospel poverty.
A
major part of Francis’ rule of life was to not own anything. He reasoned that
if he didn’t own anything, there was nothing he had that thieves would want. He
didn’t have to protect anything he didn’t own. He did not have to take care of
property he didn’t have. Not owning anything, he had complete freedom to follow
Jesus and to live a life devoted to the Gospel. As this way of life grew and
others joined him, he made it clear that his religious order would NOT own
property. They rented the place in which they lived for a bushel of fish a
year. They went door to door begging for food, or ate the discarded food in the
garbage. They begged for money to support their ministry.
Francis
and his new religious order accomplished much in those early years, and the
order grew in number. Francis may not have owned any material things, but he
did own one thing, his religious order. Toward the end of his life, he was
asked to give up this one last possession, the control he had over this
religious order. His religious order had become “his family”. He was asked to
let go of his control, to let his family go. This was very difficult for him to
do. Francis placed God first. Francis placed his discipleship to Jesus first,
and let go of his religious order.
This
is the level of commitment to discipleship that Jesus is calling on us to make
today. Are we prepared to make the sacrifice of letting go of everything in
order to follow him? Are we prepared to take up our cross and follow Jesus? If
we are not, we are not ready to be disciples of Jesus.